Trump Proposes Major Shift: Calls for End to Quarterly Corporate Reporting
Trump Suggests End to Quarterly Earnings
New York – Former U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed a sweeping change to how American companies disclose their financial performance, suggesting that firms should no longer be required to publish quarterly earnings reports.
Financial Updates Every Six Months
In a post on Truth Social, Trump argued that corporations should instead share financial updates every six months, claiming the shift would cut costs and allow executives to focus on managing their businesses more effectively.
Short-Term vs Long-Term Thinking
According to Trump, quarterly reporting encourages short-term decision-making aimed at appeasing investors, while long-term goals are often overlooked. He highlighted comparisons with China, where companies reportedly plan decades ahead rather than focusing on immediate results.
Previous Criticism of “Quarterly Capitalism”
The idea of reducing reporting frequency is not entirely new. Influential figures such as JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and legendary investor Warren Buffett have previously criticized “quarterly capitalism,” stressing that it pressures companies to prioritize short-term gains over sustainable growth. Hillary Clinton also voiced concern over this practice during her 2016 presidential campaign.
Supporters See Cost Savings
Supporters of Trump’s proposal argue that quarterly filings place an unnecessary burden on corporations and may have contributed to the shrinking number of publicly traded companies in the United States.
Concerns Over Transparency
However, critics warn that less frequent reporting could limit timely insights into industries and the broader economy. For example, quarterly updates from airlines reveal travel trends, banks signal potential loan risks, and technology firms provide early signs of emerging market shifts.
SEC Approval Required
Any such change would require approval from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Analysts suggest that while there is growing industry support for semi-annual reporting, the process of rulemaking and data collection could take months before any decision is finalized.
Global Comparisons
Globally, similar adjustments have already been made. Both the European Union and the United Kingdom abandoned quarterly reporting in favor of six-month periods during the 2010s. Trump himself previously urged the SEC to study this option back in 2018.
Debate Expected to Intensify
Market experts believe the debate will intensify in the coming months, as policymakers, investors, and regulators weigh the benefits of reduced bureaucracy against the potential risks of delayed financial transparency.
Trump’s Push for Long-Term Thinking
By proposing an end to quarterly reporting, Trump aims to encourage companies to focus on long-term growth instead of short-term profit margins. Analysts believe this change could allow CEOs and executives to make decisions that strengthen businesses for the future rather than just meeting immediate shareholder demands.
Impact on Investor Transparency
Quarterly reports have long served as a critical tool for investors, giving them frequent updates on company performance. Eliminating them may reduce transparency, making it harder for investors to evaluate risks and opportunities in real time. Critics argue this could increase volatility in the stock market.
Business Community’s Mixed Reaction
The proposal has divided the business community. Some CEOs welcome the idea, seeing it as relief from the pressure of quarterly earnings. Others fear that without regular reporting, investor trust could weaken, and companies may find it harder to raise capital.
Global Comparisons and Practices
Globally, financial reporting practices vary. While the U.S. currently requires quarterly disclosures, other countries like the U.K. and European Union largely rely on semiannual reporting. Trump’s proposal would align U.S. businesses more closely with international norms, potentially reducing compliance burdens.
Potential Legislative and Regulatory Challenges
For this proposal to move forward, significant legislative and regulatory changes would be required. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Congress would need to approve adjustments to current laws. Experts say this could take years and face opposition from investor advocacy groups.
Investor Reactions Remain Divided
Some investors support the proposal, saying less frequent reporting could reduce market volatility and speculation. Others argue that delayed information would create uncertainty and disadvantage smaller investors.
Possible Impact on Stock Prices
Analysts caution that if reporting is reduced, sudden earnings surprises may become more frequent, potentially leading to sharper market swings and unpredictable stock price movements.
Corporate Governance Concerns
Governance experts warn that fewer reports could make it harder to detect corporate mismanagement or fraud early. Regular disclosures, they argue, are a safeguard for accountability.
Potential Political Angle
Critics suggest Trump’s proposal may also carry political weight, appealing to business leaders frustrated by regulation. Supporters, however, say it reflects a genuine push to modernize financial reporting.
Future of U.S. Financial Regulations
If adopted, this change could reshape U.S. corporate reporting standards for decades. The outcome may determine whether America aligns with global practices or continues its tradition of frequent disclosures.
🔗 Internal Link
👉 More Business & Economy News on NewsUpdates
🔗 External Link
👉 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Official Website
